3221 Views
Hi Serena,
1. The existing and efficient branches refer to the different technologies that are available across all scenarios. In the current accounts scenario you must create the tree structure that will be used in all scenarios. In this case, two different technologies are evaluated at most branches: an existing technology and a more efficient technology. Different branches are required for each because they have different parameters (costs, efficiencies, etc.). This allows you to then change the activity level to match the different scenario you want to evaluate.
2. You do not need to create separate scenarios for each policy measure, but the completed datasets online do separate them out si that it is easier to see the reductions from each measure. The alternative is to create one comprehensive mitigation scenario that includes all measures.
Remember that the training exercises only show you one way to set up a LEAP model. There are always other methods and approaches.
3. Be careful that you understand which data maps to which variable. The data that defines the penetration of refrigerators - interp(2014,0,2025,100) should go in the activity level variable as a share.
The efficiency of the refrigerator should go in the final energy intensity variable, but this is a constant, not a function (the text says that new efficient refrigerators will have an average intensity of 380 kWh/yr).
And the cost should be entered as an annualized cost on the demand cost tab ata cost of $100 annualized over 10 years. If you're unsure about a function, you can always read the help file associated with it.
4. The -99 value that you are referring to in the annualized cost function is an old method from an outdated version of LEAP. Please download the newer Freedonia datasets associated with the new training materials for more correct results.
Best,
Tory