2137 Views
Hi there,
Hm, I'm afraid that LEAP doesn't just ignore exogenous capacity additions in an optimized transformation module. Are you certain that you've specified a large enough value in the Exogenous Capacity tab to be able to see it, when you view Results? Be sure to keep an eye on the units of the Exogenous Capacity that you're adding.
That said, I should make you aware of some issues that you may run into while using the optimization algorithm. We are aware of these and they are being addressed in the next version of LEAP, which will be released not too long from now. In short, current limitations do not permit the direct comparison of costs between optimized and non-optimized scenarios. Part of this is due to the fact that Exogenous Capacity that is specified in Current Accounts is assumed (by Optimized transformation modules) to be built in the first scenario year, rather than treated as pre-existing capacity. In addition, any capacity that is built in an optimized transformation module will not be retired, even if the length of the scenario exceeds the lifetime of the transformation process.
If you find that you encounter other issues, I'm happy to help answer further questions on the topic, but to summarize - there remain other kinks in LEAP's implementation of the OSeMOSYS optimization routines, which will be resolved shortly. However, the ability to add exogenous capacity is not one of them, so you should be able to do this without a problem.
Hope this helps,
Taylor