135 Views
Hi Oriol,
I'm not sure I understand your comment that you are unable to define heat demand in your scenarios without first knowing the heat generation. Can you describe what you're trying to achieve?
Note that LEAP is a demand-based accounting model, which means that its transformation modules (optimized or not) run in order to generate the fuels required on the demand-side. This is in contrast to a model which defines energy demand by first calculating energy supply, which sounds like what you've described. By definition, fuels which are co-products are not generated to meet any module requirements: they are either consumed if there is a need for them, or they are wasted.
This means that you will need to exogenously define the demand for heat in your scenarios. This demand may or may not be satisfied by heat which is co-produced by CHP (to emphasize - since heat is a co-product, power plants are not dispatched to satisfy heat requirements).
LEAP does not provide a facility for optimizing both the supply and demand of fuels. Its optimization functions are restricted to provide a least-cost solution *at the level of the individual transformation module*, but not for the energy system as a whole.
http://www.energycommunity.org/WebHelpPro/Optimization/OptimizationIntroduction.htm
Hope this helps,
Taylor