• 214 views | 3 messages Discussion: LEAP
    Topic: Weighting of time slices (with NEMO) Subscribe | Previous | Next
  • Matthew Davis 4/11/2024

    Hello,

    I have a general question about handling of time slices. For a given time slice set up, for each time slice we can specify the 'hours' and the 'value' in each time slice. Assuming we have a system energy load shapes (% of annual energy) as well as availability shapes for variable renewables. My question is: if we have different 'hours' from one time slice to the next, does LEAP and NEMO use this as a unique weighting of each time slice in its calculations of results? To put it as a simple example, if there are 4 time slices in a model, and the hours are 1000, 1000, 1000, 5760 - will there be more "weight" placed on the fourth time slice in calculation of final annual results?

    Thank you,
    Matthew Davis
  • Taylor Binnington 8/14/2024
      Best Response

    Hi Matthew - sorry for the wait.

    The very short answer is yes, LEAP factors in the width (number of hours) in a time slice when performing calculations. Converting the % of annual energy into a corresponding power requirement (and % of peak load in a year), and vice versa, is an example of when differential time slice widths would affect the outcome. For availability shapes, the value you insert into the yearly shape is simple the value taken for all hours of that time slice. You may (or you can view within LEAP) the "yearly mean" from a time-sliced shape, and LEAP is well aware of the number of hours in each time slice when performing that calculation.

    Do you have something else specific in mind when you say "weight"?

    Taylor
  • Matthew Davis 8/20/2024
      Best Response

    Hi Taylor,

    Thank you for the reply.

    I think we are on the same page when we say "weight" or "width" and I understand the "Converting the % of annual energy into a corresponding power requirement". However, I am wondering if LEAP will take into account the width of the time slices when calculating results other than peak load/power requirement, such as generation output and costs.

    If I could use a simple hypothetical example to illustrate my question: if we have 2 time slices (1000, 7760) and the generation profile of slice 1 is high cost and the generation profile of slice 2 is low cost, will the total annual cost be "weighted" according to the number of hours in each slice [ (cost of slice 1 * 1000/8760) + (cost of slice 2 * 7760/8760) ], or are they treated equally 50/50 [ cost of slice 1 + cost of slice 2 ]? In the former, there is a more accurate account of results. So if a time slice has a higher number of hours, it should contribute more to the annual results, in proportion to its fraction of annual hours.

    Thanks,
    Matt